|
Specializing
in Organic/Natural Search Engine Rankings & 1st Page Results For Your Business
Experts
In Targeting Your Customers Locally, Nationally or Internationally
-
| |
|
| |
A study has added tangible evidence to
the widely held view that top-ranking
search results get the most attention
from users, and that lower-ranking
results are all but invisible to most
people. The findings of this eye
tracking study lend further credibility
to the notion that organic search engine
optimization is still critical to the
overall success of a search marketing
campaign.
We are the search engine
optimization, internet marketing company chosen by web design
firms, hosting companies and directories for their clients.
Many of them either ask us to be their "in house" SEO
department, or refer their clients to us with confidence when
they are looking for reliable internet marketing experts.
|
|
|
|
A New F-Word for Google Search Results
By Chris Sherman in the Search Day Newsletter

Heat maps
from user eye tracking studies of three websites. The areas
where users looked the most are colored red; the yellow areas
indicate fewer views, followed by the least-viewed blue areas.
Gray areas didn't attract any fixations.
A
study has added tangible evidence to the widely held
view that top-ranking search results get the most attention
from users, and that lower-ranking results are all but
invisible to most people.
The joint study conducted by search marketing firms examined
the eye movements of users viewing Google search result
pages.
The study found that most viewers looked at results in an
"F" shaped scan pattern, with the eye traveling vertically
along the far left side of the results looking for visual
cues (relevant words, brands, etc) and then scanning to the
right, as if something caught the participant's attention.
The researchers called this pattern a "golden triangle" at
the top of result pages. The triangle extends across the top
natural search result, then angles back to the left of the
page down to the bottom-most "above the fold" result,
typically in the third or fourth position on the page.
This area was viewed by 100% of the 50 participants in the
study.
With both organic and sponsored search results, higher
ranking results were viewed more often. Here are results for
organic results (percentages represent the number of study
participants viewing the listing):
Organic Search Results Viewed:
Rank 1 - 100%
Rank 2 - 100%
Rank 3 - 100%
Rank 4 - 85%
Rank 5 - 60%
Rank 6 - 50%
Rank 7 - 50%
Rank 8 - 30%
Rank 9 - 30%
Rank 10 - 20%
A similar, though smaller triangle effect was also observed
for the sponsored listings on the right side of Google
search result pages. In aggregate, fewer people looked at
the sponsored listings; the exception to this was then
sponsored ads were served at the top of a search result page
as well as on the right side of the page. Ads at the top of
the page were viewed by 100% of study participants.
Sponsored Listings Viewed (right side):
Sponsored listing 1 - 50%
Sponsored listing 2 - 40%
Sponsored listing 3 - 30%
Sponsored listing 4 - 20%
Sponsored listing 5 - 10%
Sponsored listing 6 - 10%
Sponsored listing 7 - 10%
Sponsored listing 8 - 10%
These results are preliminary; a full analysis of the
results will be available soon.
Organic Search Still Rules
The findings of this eye tracking study lend further
credibility to the notion that organic search engine
optimization is still critical to the overall success of a
search marketing campaign. Last December, Jupiter Research
released a report stating that algorithmic listings in
search indexes generate an estimated six of seven
commercially natured search referrals.
The eye tracking study offers a major reason why: People
continue to favor organic listings over paid search
listings, unless the paid search listing is at the top of
the page.
And yet many search engine marketers are ignoring search
engine optimization, opting instead to go the "easier" route
of buying sponsored listings. The increasing body of
research is very clearly saying that it's a mistake to rely
solely on paid listings to drive visitors to a web site. A
well-balanced search marketing campaign should incorporate
both well-crafted search engine optimization efforts as well
as paid listings to capture the full range of searcher
behavior.
**********************************************
An article in the search day newsletter, Partial Quotes:
Outsourcing Search Engine Marketing
Outsource Of Your Companies Internet Marketing Department

By Jennifer Laycock the Web Search Guide for About.com
Search engine marketing is crucial for the success of online
businesses -- but should you take on search marketing
in-house, or outsource this challenging task to a contractor
or agency?
A
panel of experts at the recent Search Engine Strategies
Conference in Chicago addressed these issues to help
business owners make better decisions about their future
search engine marketing campaigns.
"In case anyone hasn't noticed, search engine marketing has
exploded over the last few years," said Nate Elliot, online
marketing and media analyst for Jupiter Research. Elliot
also pointed out that as recently as 1997, search engine
marketing was only a $50,000 industry - this in contrast to
the $1.6 billion (or roughly 28 percent of all online ad
spending) spent on search advertising in 2003.
Because of this growth, management of search engine
marketing campaigns is becoming more complex. As businesses
face greater competition online, advertise across a wider
range of search engines, and purchase more keyword phrases,
it has become increasingly difficult for companies to handle
campaigns internally. In fact, a recent study by Jupiter
Research showed that half of all large marketers and over 30
percent of small marketers had trouble managing their own
search engine marketing campaigns.
The combination of expanding campaigns and the desire to
carefully track campaign details is causing many companies
to look to third-party firms to manage their search engine
marketing. Jupiter Research reports that 48 percent of large
marketers are currently outsourcing their SEM programs.
Their studies also show that 80 percent of companies that
outsourced are satisfied with the performance of their
campaign (compared to just 58 percent for those that handle
SEM in-house).
Jupiter Research's reports clearly indicate a trend
toward outsourcing SEM but for companies yet to make the
transition, how should you select a vendor? First, it's
important to understand the range of services that
search engine marketing companies offer. Primary
services include:
Site optimization for both organic positioning and
increased conversions
Management technology like trusted feed and bid
management
Tracking technology like ROI analysis and conversion
rates
Professional services like strategic planning
It's also important for companies to decide what
services are important to them and to seek out search
engine marketing firms accordingly. Chris Sherman
explained that it's important to think of your strategy
when making decisions about hiring an SEM firm, pointing
out that your marketing goals should dictate the method
of promotion - not the other way around. "Don't think
we're going to do organic or we're going to do paid
placement... consider what it is you are trying to
accomplish and then plan a strategy and a plan of action
accordingly."
Companies looking to outsource their search engine
marketing campaigns also need to understand that SEM is
not cheap. Prices range from $75 to more than $200 per
hour while full site optimization can start at $5,000
for a small site. Larger companies seeking to outsource
full scale search engine marketing campaigns for
e-commerce sites can expect to pay anywhere from $20,000
on up to more than $100,000 per year.
***********************************************
Advertising Agencies Need for Search Engine Skills
By J. Peggie
Traditional advertising agencies are beginning to
embrace the need for search engine optimization (SEO)
and search engine marketing (SEM).
The search engine marketing industry has developed into
a billion dollar industry and clients expect their
agencies to get them involved. Ad agencies are now
chasing the increased revenue generated by search
engines.
In the past advertising agencies tended to ignore
organic SEO as it was seen as a complicated system with
results that were difficult to measure as part of an
overall media campaign. This changed when they realized
the potential of Pay per Click (PPC). This made sense to
the agencies because its results were easily measurable
and the results were impressive.
Ad agencies need to track and manage advertising results
for their clients and there is a constant need to
measure value and ROI. Thus the lack of tools for
measuring the effectiveness of an SEO campaign was seen
as a major draw back. In the present day this is no
longer an issue as there is a large choice of measuring
options out there. However ad agencies often make use of
the SEO firm's expertise in using these tools and
analyzing the results.
To meet their client's demands many ad agencies have had
to dive straight into SEO. Their clients have become
knowledgeable of what search engines can offer them. In
fact they often have a greater knowledge of it than the
agencies. So the agencies have had to learn quickly or
risk losing some of their client base. They often chose
to outsource to the SEO experts who have the skilled
staff and the ongoing commitment to dedicate their
resources and energies to SEO.
We are now at the point where advertising agencies are
beginning to integrate search engine strategies into
their traditional advertising media mix. They are often
doing this with the help of SEO experts. This enables
them to retain their traditional role of campaign
management while outsourcing to the SEO firm. This is
often a win-win situation for both sides as they each
retain their areas of expertise while expanding their
combined market share.
********************************************
An article in the Search Engine Watch newsletter,
Partial Quotes:
The Power of Virtual Search Engine Marketing
By Anne Kennedy
"Outsourcing has hit virtually every industry, and now
it has become a vital strategy for search engine
marketing firms that not long ago insisted on attending
to every detail. Here's how the trend is playing out.
There is a wonderful folk tale about a wise man who
observed a wood cutter spending lengthy hours chopping
down trees. The wise man said "Why don't you sharpen
your axe? The wood cutter replied, "How can I when I am
so busy?" Told by Netramind's Ani Kortikar, the story
sounds a lot like working in SEM these days. Demand for
services is up and growing; hours in the day are not.
How do you expand to meet demand for your search
marketing services without increasing payroll and
overhead? Break tasks into vital components and
outsource the ones you don't want to do to other
specialists..."
|
|
|
Comparison Shopping Engines
Retail Sales
Today, more and more consumers are heading to Comparison Shopping Engines (CSEs) as their first stop when purchasing goods online. The rising popularity of CSEs demands that online retailers understand the difference in the platforms and how each CSE operates. Taking advantage of the diverse CSE platforms is essential to a successful CSE campaign.
The CSE Landscape
There are more than 50 different comparison shopping engines with each one working on ways to differentiate itself from the rest. While a few can tout a higher number of total general consumers, many are targeted to specific demographics that offer a higher conversion rate for specific products. For this reason, online retailers must not only know about the biggest players in the CSE market, but also the specialty CSEs.
Examples of different types of engines:
- Traditional: Shopzilla, Nextag, Yahoo Shopping
- Crawler: Pronto, MS Live, ShopWiki,
- Pure Decision Support: Mpire.com
- Occasion-based: Gifts.com, FindGift.com
- Demographic/Vertical: Glam, GolfReview.com
- Community Minded: Kaboodle, Jellyfish.com
- Web 2.0: Stylehive
- Visual search: Like.com
- Free: TheFind, Google Product Search
- Cost Per Acquisition/Order: Jellyfish.com, Shop.com
CPC, CPA, CPO, Free – What does it all mean?
When entering the CSE market, retailers should be aware of the three pricing models. The first, and most common, is the Cost-Per-Click (CPC) model. CPC shopping engines (Shopzilla, Nextag, Gifts.com, etc.) basically charge for each click, or lead, they send to the retailer. For the most part, the small price is worth it because these consumers are more qualified than the average Web user, guaranteeing a higher probability of a sale.
The second pricing model, and most popular, is the free model. There are much fewer free comparison shopping engines -- currently Google Product Search and TheFind.com. Free CSEs allow retailers to list their product information at no cost. They do not charge anything for the leads or clicks sent to the retailer. Their profits are generally based on selling advertising on the results pages, not by charging retailers to sell their goods.
The final comparison shopping pricing model is the Cost Per Acquisition/Order model. Used by Shop.com and Jellyfish.com, this model charges the retailer only if the click/lead converts to a sale on the retailer’s website. Because this is as close as you can get to a no-risk scenario without being 100% free, these sites are becoming very popular with retailers.
To compete successfully, the retailer needs to take charge of merchandising their products across all comparison shopping sites regardless of pricing models, demographic data, or targeted market. This entails identifying and incorporating the unique offers and search terms that drive traffic and convert customers on every site. It also requires removing non-profitable items and quickly filtering products in the data feed based on any criteria. By gaining a complete understanding of the CSE market, retailers can proactively merchandise their products and be assured of success in their CSE campaigns.
From ChanelAdvisor |


|
|
|
|
About Us |
Clients |
Results |
Packages |
Outsourcing |
Articles |
Contact Us |
Home
Internet Marketing By Sue
Strand
704 S. Duluth Avenue
Sioux Falls , SD 57104
605-274-1565 CST USA
Sue@suestrandinternetmarketing.com
http://www.suestrandinternetmarketing.com